<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Can't stop fiddling...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chruz.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chruz.com</link>
	<description>Pay the ferryman, its only fare.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Live Search badness by Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/08/22/windows-live-search-badness/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=207#comment-358</guid>
		<description>John, Scott,

Looks like it's just here in the U.K. See update post. Hmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, Scott,</p>
<p>Looks like it&#8217;s just here in the U.K. See update post. Hmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Live Search badness by Scott Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/08/22/windows-live-search-badness/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=207#comment-338</guid>
		<description>That's weird... where are you located? If I search for Oregon in the US I get totally legit search items:

http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/2276/livejp5.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s weird&#8230; where are you located? If I search for Oregon in the US I get totally legit search items:</p>
<p><a href="http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/2276/livejp5.png" rel="nofollow">http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/2276/livejp5.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Live Search badness by Scott Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/08/22/windows-live-search-badness/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=207#comment-337</guid>
		<description>firefox dot org dot uk has a huge download link when I go to it. It does say it's not officially supported by Firefox or Google, but there is a big download link in the middle. The link actually points at mozilla.org so it's at least the real file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firefox dot org dot uk has a huge download link when I go to it. It does say it&#8217;s not officially supported by Firefox or Google, but there is a big download link in the middle. The link actually points at mozilla.org so it&#8217;s at least the real file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Live Search badness by John</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/08/22/windows-live-search-badness/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=207#comment-334</guid>
		<description>I get in this order:
1) www.mozilla.com/​en-US/​firefox
2) www.mozilla.com/​en-US/​firefox/​all.html
3) www.mozilla.org
4) www.mozilla.org/​projects/​firefox
5) en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Firefox
6) firefox.org/news
7) get-firefox.org.cn
8) www.mozilla-europe.org
and my favorite:
9) www.imdb.com/title/tt0083943

I'm in the US.  Tried it with both my work's IE6, and my remote home PC's firefox.  Same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get in this order:<br />
1) <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.com/</a>​en-US/​firefox<br />
2) <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.com/</a>​en-US/​firefox/​all.html<br />
3) <a href="http://www.mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.org</a><br />
4) <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla.org/</a>​projects/​firefox<br />
5) en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Firefox<br />
6) firefox.org/news<br />
7) get-firefox.org.cn<br />
8) <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mozilla-europe.org</a><br />
and my favorite:<br />
9) <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083943" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083943</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the US.  Tried it with both my work&#8217;s IE6, and my remote home PC&#8217;s firefox.  Same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NHS connecting for health but not for IT by Adam Batkin</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/08/08/nhs-connecting-for-health-but-not-for-it/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Batkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=201#comment-276</guid>
		<description>And what's even better is that setting my user agent in Firefox (using User Agent Switcher) to IE7 seems to let it work just fine. (well, I can get to the next page; don't have anything to book so I can't go any father than that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what&#8217;s even better is that setting my user agent in Firefox (using User Agent Switcher) to IE7 seems to let it work just fine. (well, I can get to the next page; don&#8217;t have anything to book so I can&#8217;t go any father than that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NHS connecting for health but not for IT by James Green</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/08/08/nhs-connecting-for-health-but-not-for-it/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>James Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=201#comment-275</guid>
		<description>This is just supremely lazy and unacceptable!

The NHS is supposed to be inclusive and unfortunately CFH has become taken over by "Microsoft Moonies".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just supremely lazy and unacceptable!</p>
<p>The NHS is supposed to be inclusive and unfortunately CFH has become taken over by &#8220;Microsoft Moonies&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Latitude Festival 2008 by wardler</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/07/24/latitude-festival-2008/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>wardler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=193#comment-268</guid>
		<description>you're damn right it was!! Was good to bump into you...and finally find out The Girl's name! xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re damn right it was!! Was good to bump into you&#8230;and finally find out The Girl&#8217;s name! xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sometimes I forget that this blog is syndicated&#8230; by Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/07/10/sometimes-i-forget-that-this-blog-is-syndicated/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=191#comment-239</guid>
		<description>@nicu - Yes, you're right. Red Hat naturally seemed a little frosty towards CentOS In The Beginning but have now warmed to the extent they run fedorapeople spaces on it!

@Bucky - Personally I'd never compare RHEL and Fedora. I think my frustration at time stems from extensive changes (e.g. recent Perl upgrade) where I'd like to see it instead left to the next version to stand out as a a feature - Look, Fedora x has the latest Perl! I think the stability pendulum has swung too far towards bleeding edge stuff.

@Clifton - You are vanquished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nicu - Yes, you&#8217;re right. Red Hat naturally seemed a little frosty towards CentOS In The Beginning but have now warmed to the extent they run fedorapeople spaces on it!</p>
<p>@Bucky - Personally I&#8217;d never compare RHEL and Fedora. I think my frustration at time stems from extensive changes (e.g. recent Perl upgrade) where I&#8217;d like to see it instead left to the next version to stand out as a a feature - Look, Fedora x has the latest Perl! I think the stability pendulum has swung too far towards bleeding edge stuff.</p>
<p>@Clifton - You are vanquished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sometimes I forget that this blog is syndicated&#8230; by Clifton</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/07/10/sometimes-i-forget-that-this-blog-is-syndicated/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=191#comment-238</guid>
		<description>pecker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pecker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sometimes I forget that this blog is syndicated&#8230; by Bucky</title>
		<link>http://www.chruz.com/2008/07/10/sometimes-i-forget-that-this-blog-is-syndicated/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Bucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chruz.com/?p=191#comment-237</guid>
		<description>As long as RedHat sponsors a cutting-edge distribution as well as a stable distribution, the cutting-edge one will be perceived as a beta for the stabler one. There's no real way around that.

I'm always just a little puzzled when people compare Fedora and RHEL, and come up negative. How is Fedora's being just THAT far away from being an Enterprise-grade environment a negative thing? How is Fedora's having the newest software that I can reasonably expect to actually run a negative thing?

These are the reasons I run Fedora in the first place. They've always been true. If there's an identity crisis among developers, let me just declare, as nothing but an end-user, that I don't really have a problem with Fedora, its history, or its direction (though I do resolve the right to bitch like the world is ending from time to time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as RedHat sponsors a cutting-edge distribution as well as a stable distribution, the cutting-edge one will be perceived as a beta for the stabler one. There&#8217;s no real way around that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always just a little puzzled when people compare Fedora and RHEL, and come up negative. How is Fedora&#8217;s being just THAT far away from being an Enterprise-grade environment a negative thing? How is Fedora&#8217;s having the newest software that I can reasonably expect to actually run a negative thing?</p>
<p>These are the reasons I run Fedora in the first place. They&#8217;ve always been true. If there&#8217;s an identity crisis among developers, let me just declare, as nothing but an end-user, that I don&#8217;t really have a problem with Fedora, its history, or its direction (though I do resolve the right to bitch like the world is ending from time to time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
